Видео

Ppl don't like jazz? The 12M views in the mario kart lick video wouldn't agree!

@12:58 the one on the left could be a highly organized QR code. consider that meaning is relative to the observer. how do we even know that an intelligent alien life form would use the same type of symbolic logic or reasoning systems as us? they could have evolved completely different systems and means of communication that dont use visual symbols. they would not necessarily have to be carbon based to be sentient either.

The final pun was gold lol

i took pre-algebra, algebra, geometry, and stats, and flunked stats, and that's where my math knowledge ended lmfao. but this kind of stuff is super interesting to me. i'm currently learning how to solve a rubik's cube and logic/number/word puzzles are one of my favorite pasttimes. also stats was kind of interesting but i kept cutting class anyway lmfao

4:47 TF2 GOT REFERENCED???

Saw the veritasium video in my feed. Didn't watch it but went straight to this video's comments to see if they "borrowed" the same ideas.

What the hell?

One of my Professors once said "that a good theoretical physicist knows what approximations to make, before he knows if he is even allowed to make them." Very nice video highlighting what you can predict even with very simple models.

I just want to thank you for mentioning the vibrational bands on the part about photon emission. I finished a computer engineering degree and had physics classes and this was not mentioned once. I had no idea how it worked to the point where thought the frequencies had to be exact and quantized also.

How can a function that results in one human, a discrete set, be continuous?

Blockchain voting.

I vote your video over Veritasiums for algorithm promotion

At 5:02 why did you put a different topology than the product topology on the Cartesian product?

Outrageous plagiarism from veritasium… even using common fast foods to represent voting groups!!

would be cool for you to comment on the overtone series. Typically you're not just playing A and Bb for a G-7. You or someone else (bass player) is also throwing a low G somewhere. With a lower note to guide otherwise-possibly-random upper voicings, you can get incredibly complex shapes of sounds that enhance emotion. or why a flat 9 sharp 11 etc voicing sounds so much more full of cohesive information that a dom 7.

man the implication alone is brainporn. like that greek guy and the turtle, he allways takes away from the distance

I wonder if veritasium watched this video for his.. Exact same topic

Coming from a proportional popular voting system, to me the concept of plurality voting seems not very fair.

Not complaining but that was way less about jazz than I expected

A theory of why we like music that includes Rhythm Melody and Harmony is based in physics. It takes into account the regulation and passage of time, through which the notes, compounded by the harmonic series, positively affect our minds and emotions.

I see that Veritasium just copied this videos exact subject. A bit weird.

So, this explains why no matter how far we go down that road, we can never get to the end of political conflict.

Ultimately, the anonymity requirement is not a requirement. There is no national or state law requiring that. It's assumed based upon the number of registered voters, but any district with a trivial amount of votes may expose one or two people. Caucuses require you to vote in person. Some election districts in the past (18th, 19th centuries) had public voting. People may have a continuous spectrum on issues, but candidates are discrete and treated ordinally.

This only assumes that we're using a first-past-the-post two party system. In which case there's a lot more obvious well known issues that come before "I can make a graph into a mobius strip 🤤"

Check out Fair group decisions via non-deterministic proportional consensus by Jobst Heitzig, Forest W. Simmons and Sara M. Constantino. I think it's a super cool voting method that deserves more attention. It too has certain flaws though. Voting has to be constrained in such a way that the outcome of the vote is limited in power. If at any point the losing party finds it more acceptable to revolt against the system than to accept the results of the vote, then the voting system has failed. If 60% can vote to enslave the other 40%, it doesn't matter how fair or mathematically clean the voting system is, the system has failed because the 40% don't have sufficient reason to accept the outcome of the vote.

This is one of the best educational videos I’ve seen this year so far.

had to put the USSR anthem (my beloved) to watch this video because the sound of the intro.

I'm so glad i studied math. Incidentally, i understand everything lol

so theoretically, if you graph out the mass of everything in the universe and then take the area under the curve, you can count how many things exist in the universe. i tried it for fun but desmos was unhappy even when i scaled everything down

Continuity is an approximation of the statement P:= “small changes in votes should lead to small changes in the outcome”. The number of voters is finite thus discrete. Even if the set of voters could somehow be mapped bijectively to the continuum, the function phi would still be discrete in actuality. In our presidential elections the image of phi is, for all practical purposes, a set with two elements.

i´m physicst and musician, this is the best video that youtube can show me, thanks a lot.

jazz is not more complex and less structured than classical music... it follows far more regular patterns than classical music

I'd never heard of a one-dimensional circle! The things you learn.

I think the major problem with this is also assuming that the vote's output should be continuous, as people typically vote for discrete states of outcome. Naturally it will be impossible to map a continuous input space to a discrete output space without introducing some discontinuity.

Almost all male jazz listeners are gay

Well, I grew up listening to music that was fairly dissonant, and so I find it “normal” while those that didn’t often crinkle their noses and say things like “that sounds funny”. Then they accuse me of being a music snob to which I reply “you only like boring music”. But more recently, as my Spotify music collection has grown, my tastes have changed, reflecting an increasing interest in more dissonant and freeer jazz. Music I thought was cool a year ago now doesn’t interest me anymore. And now I am studying Frank Zappa’s instrumental also music which was a bit out there even for me many years ago. Anyway, I learned a long time ago that my love of dissonance meant I could not bring my music to work and play it there. Anyone else have that experience of being the only lover of “strange” music at work? Maybe more people need to watch this video.

This is eccelent work and I feel gratefull towards this beirdo for theaching me not only mathematics but also logiics and civics

Thank you so much! My linear algebra professor never explained why any of this stuff was actually important..

I can't believe you mentioned Mobius strips without taking a strip of paper, giving it a twist, and taping the ends together, then running your finger along it to demonstrate that it _only has one side._

I'm glad to see someone acknowledging the limitations inherent in voting. I see people making very intelligent videos but yet blindly falling into the painful trap of berating voting systems that don't "weigh all votes equally."

The voting system he describes is a pure democracy. The United States, while having democratic values, is NOT a pure democracy, it is a republic. The problem with a pure democracy is that it can lead to the tyranny of the majority with the minority having no voice. The founding Fathers realized this and instituted the Electoral College for Presidential elections. Each state has a number of electors based on population. The candidate who wins the state is supposed to get ALL the electoral votes. So, it is possible to win the majority of votes nationally while losing the election. It may seem unfair, but it protects the right of those living in small states and areas of the country with low population from the tyranny of the big city populace (overwhelmingly liberal and progressive Democrats). It forces candidates to addrress their concerns.

You make a video about a graph puzzle and you don't even talk about graphs

Classical musicians: we don't

oww! Paused at 10:45 when you reduced to 2 voters, that's gonna be trouble. You gotta have an odd number for a majority vote to work... unpausing to see where you will take this...

can you do an analysis on how preferential voting works in this lens?

Once I had to get an MRI and was asked if I wanted to listen to some jazz during the examination. I dislike jazz so much that I said no and just preferred listening to the random noises of the MRI machine.

i don't get why voting should be continuous. if there's 2 options of course it's not gonna be continuous

Very funny and interesting. I think that continuity hypothesis has to be discarded, here the reason: - the function argument is discrete, only a definite number of choices are allowed, and the output, too. - little change in one of the voter's opinion can change the results: in a majoritarian system, when there is a tie, changing the vote of one person will change the result. In a proportional system, changing a few votes will change the tresholds and the distribution of seats.

dude ure amazing

I'm not sure of the consequence or even f I understand this correctly but isn't anonymity just lost because if the vote is unanimous we know who the person voted for?